关键词： 电子商务平台   “二选一”   专门法  

摘要： 电子商务平台所实施的“二选一”行为本质上系独家交易,是排除、限制竞争行为在电子商务领域内的表现。基于电子商务平台“二选一”的行为限制经营者的归属选择权、侵害消费者的自主选择权、损害电子商务平台的公平竞争权以及阻碍电子商务市场的可持续发展,对其进行法律规制实属必要之举。从公法规范体系出发,《电子商务法》《反不正当竞争法》《反垄断法》并不适用于打击电子商务平台“二选一”的平台乱象,存在“应然”与“实然”的差异。从私法规范出发,电子商务平台与经营者之间地位的不平等、电子商务平台“二选一”行为存在胁迫或者无效格式条款的情形认定困难、电子商务平台“二选一”行为呈现公共性特征导致无法适用单纯的私法规范来解决电子商务平台“二选一”行为所带来的不利影响。因此,应当借鉴欧盟《P2B条例》制定专门法对电子商务平台“二选一”行为进行针对性调整。

关键词： 电子商务   经营者   责任形态  

摘要： 在《电子商务法》实施之前,电商平台经营者的法律地位和义务在电子商务纠纷中一直存在争议。随着《电子商务法》的出台,电商平台经营者的法律地位得到了明确界定,其承担的法定义务也得到了进一步明确。然而,其中“相应责任”的规定使得电商平台经营者在某些情况下难以准确认定其责任。本文从电商平台经营者的法律地位出发,对其在电子商务纠纷中的法定义务和责任形态进行分析。并探讨电商平台经营者应承担的义务界限,以及在不同情况下应如何履行这些义务。Prior to the implementation of the Electronic Commerce Law, there had been ongoing debate regarding the legal status and obligations of e-commerce platform operators in disputes. With the promulgation of the Law, their legal status was clearly defined, and their statutory obligations were further specified. However, the stipulation of “corresponding responsibilities” made it difficult for e-commerce platform operators to accurately identify their responsibilities in certain situations. This paper analyzes the legal status of e-commerce platform operators and their statutory obligations and responsibilities in disputes, exploring the boundaries of their obligations and how they should fulfill these obligations in different situations.

关键词： 律师事务所   法律解读   问答形式   日常生活   法律条文   疑惑  

摘要： 日常生活中我们经常会遇到一些法律问题,并因此心生疑惑,我们邀请北京元都律师事务所的黄长勇律师通过问答形式来解答这些疑惑,并对相关法律条文进行解读。希望通过律师的回答和解读能够助大家破除疑云,让生活更加顺畅无忧。

关键词： 互联网金融犯罪   法律规制   电子证据   协同治理  

摘要： 随着互联网技术在金融领域的广泛运用,众多新型金融产品、服务应运而生,互联网金融犯罪也日渐增多。由于互联网金融犯罪具有低成本、易实施、隐蔽性强等特点,现行的法律在应对时显得力不从心。因而需要规范管辖模式,确立电子证据的基本规则,加强机构、部门间的交流与协作,完善法律法规。唯有如此,才能为金融行业的持续健康发展提供有力保障。

关键词： 建省   新疆   晚清   法权   大一统  

摘要： 行政地理与行政区是王朝国家划分空间塑造政治认同的重要方式,是国家领土观的重要体现。天下观念与天下体系下,新疆历史上长期以军府制治理为主,直至清末改建行省。作为历代治疆的一个重要事件,学界给予晚清新疆建省较为充分的关注,但长期以来忽略了新疆建省的法律维度及作为法律实践的新疆建省。晚清政府将边疆建省作为对内整合凝聚、对外塑造国际形象,重塑国家行政地理的重大改革举措,新疆以前所未有的明确的法律地位成为晚清首个边疆省份及清代第19省,建省具有突出而深广的法律意涵及政治意义。本文将晚清新疆建省的研究视野拓展到政治、经济、军事、文化之外的法律领域,尝试探索在更大广度、更多维度及更深层面理解晚清新疆建省这一19世纪末期近代中国追求更广泛的国家统一性的努力,并以此为切入具体而微地思考近代以来以“大一统”为指向的法权秩序与中国道路的多样性、复杂性、差异性与开放性。

关键词： 直播带货主播   虚假宣传   法律规制  

摘要： 近年来,直播带货行业呈现出蓬勃发展的态势,为消费者提供更加多元的购物方式。直播带货行业的野蛮生长,导致一些不正当竞争行为接踵而至,其中直播带货主播虚假宣传行为尤为突出。该行为不仅严重侵犯消费者的合法权益,更严重扰乱了直播带货市场竞争秩序,必须加以规制。由于我国尚未制定专门针对直播带货行业的法律,监管部门通常依据《反不正当竞争法》《广告法》《消费者权益保护法》等法律对主播虚假宣传行为加以处罚。但传统法律对直播带货主播虚假宣传行为的规制效果欠佳,为了更好保护消费者合法权益、维护市场竞争秩序,必须对现有法律规制的不足之处进行研究,并完善直播带货主播虚假宣传行为的法律规制。In recent years, the live streaming industry has shown a vigorous development trend, providing consumers with more diverse shopping methods. The unchecked growth of the live streaming industry has led to a series of unfair competition practices, with the most prominent being the false advertising by live streaming hosts. This behavior not only seriously infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, but also seriously disrupts the market competition order of live streaming market, which must be regulated. Since China has not yet formulated a law specifically for the live streaming industry, regulatory authorities usually punish anchors for false advertising based on laws such as the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, the Advertising Law, and the Consumer Protection Law. However, the traditional legal system has not achieved good results in regulating the false propaganda behavior of live streaming anchors. In order to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and maintain the order of market competition, it is necessary to study the deficiencies of the existing legal regulation and improve the legal regulation of the false propaganda behavior of live streaming anchors.

关键词： 虚假宣传   直播电商   法律责任  

摘要： 直播电商行业发展迅速,直播带货成为新型销售方式,直播电商虚假宣传问题日益严重和严峻,认识虚假宣传中“引人误解”的核心地位,把握直播带货的发展趋势,通过对直播电商虚假宣传行为类型化的研究,从而进一步思考对虚假宣传行为规制的必要性。目前,我国对直播电商虚假宣传行为的法律规制并未形成完整的法律体系,仍然存在很多问题,通过对参与主体的分析及对《反不正当竞争法》《广告法》等相关法律规范的认识研究,提出对法律规范的完善以及加强监管体系,促进直播电商的稳定、健康发展。The live e-commerce sector has been evolving at a rapid pace. Live streaming for selling products has emerged as a novel sales approach. The issue of false promotion in live e-commerce has been increasingly serious and acute. Recognizing the core status of “misleading” in false promotion, grasping the development trend of live streaming selling, and conducting a typological study of false promotion behaviors in live e-commerce can facilitate further contemplation on the necessity of regulating such false promotion behaviors. Currently, China has not yet established a complete legal framework for regulating false promotion behaviors in live e-commerce, and numerous problems persist. Through the analysis of the involved entities and the study of relevant legal norms such as the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Advertising Law, proposals for the improvement of legal norms and the reinforcement of the supervision system can be put forward to promote the stable and healthy development of live e-commerce.

关键词： 残疾人   体系保障   监督   托举   经济社会   幸福  

摘要： 作为社会大家庭中的较为弱势的群体,残疾人需要得到更多的关爱和尊重,需要更完善的制度体系保障他们的合法权益,也需要更强有力的措施监督相关法规政策的落地变现,为他们托举“稳稳的幸福”,让他们共同享受我省经济社会高质量发展的成果。

关键词： 法律翻译   交叉学科研究   科学计量分析   CiteSpace   数据驱动  

摘要： 随着数据时代的到来以及国家间交往的日益频繁,法律翻译研究的范畴和意义不断拓展,要求我国法律翻译研究具有更广的国际视野和更高的战略格局,以满足我国法治传播和社会发展的需要。本研究基于Web of Science数据,借助CiteSpace对1998年以来国际法律翻译研究进行全面综述。研究结果表明,国际法律翻译研究整体发展态势良好,交叉学科特性日益显著,并呈现出明显的阶段性特征,但在学术合作、研究视角和方法等方面仍有改进空间。研究认为,法律翻译未来将受多学科的影响,进一步强化交叉学科趋势,并在研究范式、技术应用和人才培养等领域取得突破。研究结论可为国内外法律翻译研究提供有益参考,助力我国未来法律翻译研究的发展与创新,推动该学科的持续深化与实践应用。

关键词： 电商网络平台   数据保护   法律保护机制   场景化  

摘要： 电商网络平台的兴起正是互联网时代下,电商网络媒体不断向网络空间扩张的结果。由于平台数据具有非排他性、利益交织性等特点,电商网络平台持有的数据在权属和利用上都争论不休,仍然无法解决不同权利主体之间利益的冲突与平衡。以赋权方式保护电商网络平台数据财产利益与既有的物权、债权、知识产权体系难以相容。而新型数据财产权学说仍然强调电商网络平台对于数据的支配性,仍然无法解决此问题。平台数据的法律保护机制是一种共赢机制的设计,需要将个人、平台、社会利益纳入考虑框架。在平台对于数据的处理流程中,数据之上的人格利益与财产利益的保护程度是不同的,考虑到平台数据具有非排他性、利益交织性等特点,从利益角度界定与保护平台数据财产更具有理论基础和现实意义,因此应当建立一种阶段化和场景化的保护路径。The rise of e-commerce network platforms is precisely the result of the continuous expansion of e-commerce network media into cyberspace in the Internet era. Due to the non-exclusivity and intertwined interests of platform data, the data held by e-commerce network platforms have been debated on both ownership and utilization, and it is still not possible to resolve the conflict and balance of interests between different rights holders. The protection of e-commerce network platform data property interests by empowerment is incompatible with the established property rights, claims and intellectual property rights system. The new data property rights doctrine still emphasizes the dominance of the e-commerce network platform over the data, and still fails to solve this problem. The legal protection mechanism of platform data is the design of a win-win mechanism, which needs to include the interests of individuals, platforms, and society into the consideration framework. In the platform’s data processing process, the degree of protection of personality interests and property interests over the data is different. Considering that the platform data has the characteristics of non-exclusivity and intertwined interests, defining and protecting the platform data property from the perspective of interests is more theoretically grounded and realistic, and therefore a stage-by-stage and scenario-based protection path should be established.